I say that we are free-er because if we weren't you couldn't send me this post. You couldn't even think what you do because you wouldn't be educated.
And now we of course can get to a deep philosophical topic. Is censorship bad? What value does truth have? Is it the ultimate goal? Really? Honestly, I am not sure. When I think about all this stuff, it rather makes me depressive than happy, it is easier and happier to take a spliff, a beer, sit in front of the TV and have a nice time. On the other hand, Descartes said that he erased the lies of his life and found and kept truth. Did the knowledge that truth exists make him happier? I don't know. What I know is that most people
don't want to know the truth.
But I am not answering your post.
i was not speaking about individualism. i was talking about politicians, artists, thinkers, etc, etc. they are as old as we are. this same old story has been around for more than 2600 years.
Why do you make so large differences between you and the others? Aren't you a thinker? I think you are. Polititians are not that different as we are, they studied just like we did (or went to school) and only separated with ~20 years (you can argue if there is a politician gene if you like

).
tell me, what's the best way to apply censorship ? is it to burn all the books in a big, cozy fire, or is it to surround yourself with all the books that there is, so you get completely lost and give up with information overdose ?
Maybe you are too paranoid, I don't know. :? I always get in doubt when we talk about global censorship/master plans etc. (although I mentioned them in my previous posts). But what I know is that I can get a lot of information about psychology, medicine, more than anywhere in the past.
But where I totally agree with you is in historical documents. It is very obvious that they are not true and facts (or, as I should now say pseudo-facts) e.g. about WWII are already changed after 70 years. But if there is a masterplan I don't know, I think rather about self interest. When Caesar lied in the Bellum Gallicum it wasn't censorship to deceive us but pure self- interest, to look great.
like the best way in a war is to make the enemy kill one another, if you move the censorship into the head of the one who reads, it simplifies things, doesn't it ?
hmm, not believing everything is just sane specticism, isn't it?
i don't watch the news. i disbelive of everything that is shown on the news channel, because i know who controls it.
Neither do I. But still we both know what the Georgia conflict is. It is hard to stay out of the news.
if everyone swept their door, the world would be a cleaner place. that's my point.
Interesting point of view and sometimes I share it (when I am not in a hyper-megalomaniac state of mind

). Some kind of Biedermeier philosophy.
never once was a idea put into the machine that had the people in mind.
Wasn't the original communistic Idea that the people were in the center? That the commonwealth works for the people? (my memory is quite vague now)
But what is true is that basically every system puts the people in center. The theory is often perfect. The problem is the human...human make errors...