Quoi de neuf ?

Bienvenue sur Psychonaut.fr !

Le forum des amateur.ices de drogues et de l'exploration de l'esprit

Georgia

  • Auteur de la discussion Auteur de la discussion magickmumu
  • Date de début Date de début
There isn't enough room and there ain't quite enough sources for everyone, unless if we all devide it to equal amounts to satisfy our basic needs, instead of our greed with which believe we can distinguish ourselve from another.

To satisfy an egoistic mind, sources may come available after massive elimination of other basic claimers. Their basic needs are indirectly used to fill the exceptional greed of a few. That's why there is war.
 
"There's only a small tube to put our genes through"

Speak for yourself .

Restin , i dont deny that . I think its also possible that there were american "Military advisers" in georgia at the time and maybe even with the advancing georgian freedom fighters .
 
Then why are we in a dispute (are we at all?) ?

I only interpreted the word invasion as an act of an aggressor... I didn't say that there is no russian forces in Georgia and that the russian media speak the truth... I just wanted to state that in this specific case the US and Georgia are aggressors of this attack. Nothing more. If you agree on this, we agree.
 
Ok , but i dont want sex.......
 
hard decision but OK.........
 
W-h-a-t-s h-a-r-d......???????............!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
huh? Did you say anything?


:P
 
No . Maybe you just had a de ja vu .
 
:lol: you got me

Maybe I have HDDP/flashbacks *taunting GOD*
 
Maybe its just russian propoganda ?


( Ich bin sehr ungetauntet )
 
dammit.

(ich bin sprachlos)
 
"ich bin sprachlos"

Das glaube ich nicht . Niemals . Hirnlos ja aber nicht sprachlos .......
 
Stimmt, man ist entweder das eine oder das andere. Nur gut, dass du bekanntlich nie sprachlos bist. :P
 
Ich weiss nicht was ich sagen sollte............
 
This is what I think:

I think that on 8-8-08 Georgian forces launched a terrorist attack on the province of South Ossetia killing 2,000 people including women and children. I actually have a little bit of inside information on this topic. I stumbled across photo gallery full of photo's taken from an amateur journalist that was IN south ossetia that day. Go here for the pictures : http://www.navoine.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=112&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
GRAPHIC
Here are some:

img9558xb1.jpg


img9601ps8.jpg


Anyways back to my thoughts on the matter. I believe that the attack on south ossetia was backed by the Bush administration and a ploy to bounce McCain's voting as far as foreign policy and war experience. For example think for a second, WHY would Georgia not too much bigger than the United States Georgia, attack a Russian dominated territory with Russia taking up the mass of the continent *Looming over the top of them take such a risk
alone? I found it very hard to understand why Bush immediately jumped to the rescue of the not so mentioned sovereign of Georgia? Well take a look at the Major Oil Pipelines in the middle east. You can easily find the main oil pipeline pass RIGHT through Tsbilisi. Putin says they found a US Passport in a building that was supposedly the strategic pivotal point of this massacre where it took place. Putin also warned that any backing of NATO on Georgia's part would be a Decleration of War against the US and NATO backed countries. Well think about Russia's allies... Iran, who we just imposed major sanctions upon indicating pre-emptive warfare. If McCain wins you can bet your ass there will be Real Hell to pay :)[/b]
 
Yawn . Keep taking the pills . If you trust your doctior i`m sure he can help you .
 
I agree with Fluid although I believe the situation to be a bit more complicated. But yes.
 
If you went to the same doctor you could hold hands . You could also stand back to back in case ghosts attack you .
 
at least I took the red pill.

GOD a dit:
Restin , i dont deny that . I think its also possible that there were american "Military advisers" in georgia at the time and maybe even with the advancing georgian freedom fighters .

You agree on that but you don't agree on the purpose they were there for. OK
 
Retour
Haut