Caduceus Mercurius
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 14/7/07
- Messages
- 9 628
Yes, I did, but no, not two months ago.Forkbender a dit:You didn't ask me or Dr. Leospace to do anything about it
If you want to ban someone, you've got to explain why. I made my complaints in great detail, and at that time the forum rules still said something about "objectionable language".(remember with Ahua, where you asked everyone for a formal complaint,
In that forum thread you presented your 'case' for banning Ahua: "Listen to spice: we don't think Ahua hasn't got the right to say anything, but that he should present his ideas so that others can understand them. Most people here don't understand a word he says. The way he talks is destructive of the intelligibility of everything we talk about here."
That statement simply describes your lack of comprehension, or lack of appreciation for his nonlinear style, not a breaking of forum rules. Around that time I simply asked for clear examples of forum rules being violated, formal complaints if you will, but nothing was presented.
For months I complained about his behavior, and so did others (see for example the statement by douglas here), but you guys were simply too involved in your own ways to do something about it.Even if the ban was justified, YOU shouldn't have done it, but instead asked the people who were appointed to make these kinds of decisions. You were too much involved to make this decision.
I don't think so. I remember a thread I started some time ago, but I can't find it right now. Oh, found it, it was started by you as a result of something I wrote in another thread: "Mutual Respect". That's from June 14. There I said: "What you can moderate is objectionable language, but when the forum rules were changed half a year ago, the rule against objectionable language was omitted."I have only heard about your view that moderation wasn't good enough after you had already banned him