zezt a dit:
Magdeline is a mythical character which assumes 'Jesus' was an historical figure. when you Google that name you get links claiming Jesus was married to her. It is all nonsense. I am not wanting to encourage that literalist reading of myth, but rather share the info that Jesus like other pagan god~men is really referring to consciousness-changing vegetation
One you start taking myths literally is when all kinds of shit is acted out including actual sacrifice. INSTEAD of understand it is the mushroom which is sacrificed and ones sense of oneself, animals and humans get sacrificed
I think it is fair to say Magdeline was Jesus' wife. I don't need to google her name, I have read her gospel. Sadly lots (and specially significant) data got lost as time wrecked manuscripts. And I am not going into conspiracies here, but there's been a great deal about the manuscripts. More then you'd see in the Da Vinci Code. It's beyond a mushroom, it's about an energy that can't be placed in one word, but if we did Christ would come most near to it.
If you look beyond google into Maria Magdeline and how her relation was with Jesus you'd see it is all in your favor. Jesus even addresses circumcises. He addresses money, religious rulers, ... Can you imagen what a threath this Christ energy was among "rulers over men"? And by throwing it all away because some selfish bastards have claimed the holy spirit (goddess) to themselfs, you might throw away something with significant value along with it.
I Googled "Sauniere and the erased clues" and got links about The Da vinci Code...? That is all fiction also
This priest erased important signs which were placed by previous christfollowers and coded in the manuscripts. This is about a male dominant hiërarchy not giving in to a goddess power and you're not buying that conspiracy? :p They've been talking about this bloodline of Jesus and Maria way before Dan Brown pooped his first diper. Did you know Magdalena says in her manuscript Jesus' didn't come into life by the holy spirit and a virgin?
in you previous post you said
About the "nose out"? That is called No Planes Theory, or NPT for short. I think that is disinfo. IE that as well as their false flag we have their action of controlled opposition
No it's not that. In the NIST report they talk about the plane being shattered to pieces by the concrete collums of the building. That was in huge conflict with the nose out as some seen it go out live (such as I). Then years later I watch it all again and see it's just an opitcal illusion created by the smokecloud. I have seen it in different camera directions and it wasn't a nose, but smoke.
Disinfo or not, that's my experience.
I think WTC5 is about the best prove for an inside job. What more do you need? :)
What is it you wish to achieve by exposing 9/11? World peace? Just an honest question.