GregKasarik
Glandeuse Pinéale
- Inscrit
- 28/2/10
- Messages
- 120
Hiyall,
As you may be aware, the Australian Government is looking to make the cultivation of a huge number of plants illegal on the basis that they are considered "precursors" to mind altering substances.
This is a stupid idea, especially when one considers that DMT is rife througout the acacias and psilocybe mushrooms grow without hinderance throughout many parts of the country. There isn't any need to cultivate these, as nature makes sure that we have an adequate supply.
As part of its consultation process, the government has published a discussion paper and requested submissions to a number of questions raised by it.
Ominously, one key question not addressed is the issue of religious freedom and people who use these compounds in this context. While to be expected, it demonstrates what can only be described as a willful ignorance regarding these compounds on the part of the lawmakers.
I have made a submission, in which I explicitly acknowledge that I use these compounds as part of my religous practice and in which I put forward a defence for my use based on the protection of my religious freedoms. I have posted it to my website, along with links to the government website and another, which explains the seriousness of the proposed changes.
http://www.kasarik.com/Government-Submi ... b-2011.php
As you may be aware, the Australian Government is looking to make the cultivation of a huge number of plants illegal on the basis that they are considered "precursors" to mind altering substances.
This is a stupid idea, especially when one considers that DMT is rife througout the acacias and psilocybe mushrooms grow without hinderance throughout many parts of the country. There isn't any need to cultivate these, as nature makes sure that we have an adequate supply.
As part of its consultation process, the government has published a discussion paper and requested submissions to a number of questions raised by it.
Ominously, one key question not addressed is the issue of religious freedom and people who use these compounds in this context. While to be expected, it demonstrates what can only be described as a willful ignorance regarding these compounds on the part of the lawmakers.
I have made a submission, in which I explicitly acknowledge that I use these compounds as part of my religous practice and in which I put forward a defence for my use based on the protection of my religious freedoms. I have posted it to my website, along with links to the government website and another, which explains the seriousness of the proposed changes.
http://www.kasarik.com/Government-Submi ... b-2011.php