Every ones exchange would be to society as a whole. People would get what ever they require, no question. No one would starve, that's asinine. And even if they did it would still be much less that starve today.
How would this be acheived in your view?
To continue with my analogy of the corn farmer and the teacher. By your theory I assume (I assume because you haven't actually offered a pragmatic solution you have merely uttered a dogmatic edict) that I would set up a school and people who want to be taught would come and pay me with the fruits of their labour. So the real estate agent would offer me his services in exchange for my teaching and I don't want to sell my house so I'd then have to transfer my real estate credit to someone who does need it in exchange for a service or good that I did need, all of this would need to be documented somehow so that when a complete stranger turns up on the doorstep of the real estate agent's doorstep saying, "you owe me real estate services" the real estate agent could know that the person had validly acquired the right to the service.
You have offered no pratical solutions at all and you have the audacity to call me asinine. You clearly live in a fantasy world of make believe and you have the audacity to call me asinine. You sit at a computer paid for with money to spout this childish dribble and you have the audacity to call me asinine!
I'll tell you the value of money - it is a creation designed to easily facilitate trade such that all people can have the ability to acquire things that they need or find useful or neither need nor find useful but want anyway. I live in a country that doesn't manufacture computers or electronic parts - money enables me to acquire a computer so that I can engage in increasingly asinine debates with a completely asinine person such as yourself.
Money used to be made of gold and silver to give it an inherent value. The inherent value was derived from the scarcity of the metal and the human effort required to produce that metal. Evolution of the human race saw that slowly the value of a currency became less linked to the value of precious metals and more to the value of the country that issued the currency based on ideas such a gross domestic product, national debt etc.
One downside of money is that enables people like you to have access to a computer and the internet so that you can spread your asinine ideas around so freely and with so little actual thought into the subjects you are writing about.
You seem to think that "society" is some sort of sentient being when you say "everyone's exchange would be to society as a whole". How would society then ensure that a person who lived hundreds of kilometres away from me would then get the commodity or service that I have produced, I guess magical pixies would come and carry it on clouds of faery dust to them - the pixies of course would work for and live on love.
And you have the audacity to call me asinine! You have the audacity to tell others that they are not offering solutions when you have offered none.