Goran.Hrsak a dit:
FOR WHAT??? "abortifacient properties of rue"
WHAT U MEAN BY THAT?
RUE IS TOXIC WHAT EVER U TAKE IT! SOME KIND OF "LIGHT" CLEANING IS USELESS! MAYBE SOME OF THE POISONS WILL PASS OUT OF RUE BUT HIGH MOLECULES? HELL NO!
ALSO WHAT U GET FROM SUCH "PURIFICATION"? AYAHUASCA IS AYAHUASCA!!! WITHOUT SYRIAN RUE OR PSYCHOTRIA VIRIDIS! ONLY TRUE AYAHUASCA IS MADE FROM BANISTEREOPSIS CAAPI AND MIMOSA HOSTILIS! OTHER MIXES ARE ONLY FAKES WHICH MIMICS TRUE AYAHUASCA AND SHAMANS WHICH ARE CALLED AYAHUASCEROS. DO NOT KNOW? MAYBE PSYCHOTRIA IS PART OF TRUE AYAHUASCA, BUT ONLY SOME OF TRIBES FROM SOUTH AMERICA USE IT!?!? MIMOSA AND CAPII IS TRUE AYA!
nope, sorry you´re wrong..
first, by abortifaciant properties of the quinozaline compounds, I mean that pure rue in higher amounts can make pregnant woman abort..
but you´re wrong rue is toxic in all amounts and ways.. these toxic compounds are not soluble in water, so lemon extract leaves only b-carbolines which are the same ones as in b.caapi ..
secondly, you´re very wrong that true aya is mimosa and caapi.. Mimosa comes from a totally different geographical area than caapi. Caapi is from the amazon rainforest, mimosa (the official jurema) comes from north-east brazil, in very dry places.. They were never used together in the old times
There is no ´real´ ayahuasca.. Different tribes make different mixtures... The master plant is actually only the b.caapi, while the most common admixture is either psychotria viridis or diplopterys cabrerana (chacropanga).. So b.caapi + psychotria viridis, or b.caapi + chacropanga are both
real ayahuascas..
Not only that but there are several also ancient ´original´ mixtures.. Some tribes mix even datura, for example..
An anthropological study will show you that finding an ´original´ teaching or brew is an impossible task, just like finding an original culture. Culture is a like a living organism, always in change, one culture and tribe affecting the other, changing each generation, and so are the techniques and uses of medicinal plants. There is nothing that is more ´real´ than the other.. There are mixtures that are more common, or more usual, but this doesnt necessarily mean that uncommon things are negative
Rue is a very sacred plant for the middle east, and though general data does not show it´s use with dmt-containing plants, there are suppositions that even moses has indeed used a similar combination (benny shanon is responsible for this hypothesis´...
I dont think moralism or a search for a ´pure and original´ mixture is really of any benefit.. I think what matters is, if one decides to take anything, then doing it with respect, researching about possible side effects, being careful, being prudent, having good intent, preferring nature-friendly and sustainable techniques and substances, etc etc
Indeed I am a very big fan of ayahuasca (caapi+viridis) and have participated in rituals both in Santo Daime churches (which I did not like), but also in rituals with real shamans.. I recommend if possible this experience for people interested.. But I have also taken a pure freebase dmt + syrian rue and had amazing experience too, which brought many teachings.. One thing doesnt eliminate the other, I wont quit participating in rituals and neither stop having my own lone psychonaut experiences.. I do know that in whatever way I do open my mind, I will try to have as much respect as possible, try to have a good intention and be careful with any possible side effects or interactions..
