I don't think any of the statements I have posted here in the past one or two months have been simpleminded. In fact my views are extremely complex and subtle. Well, either I'm not intelligent at all, or the things I say aren't garbage. But whatever your conclusion may be, don't base it on...

That's not true. I also use the term "conspiracy theorist" in a derogatory way, but I don't look up to Bush or ANY authority figure. Nor do I reject EVERYTHING people like David Icke, Alex Jones, Benjamin Fulford or Mike Adams say. The British monarchy IS evil, but they're not shapeshifting...

If that is your preconceived notion of me (based on the past rather than the present), communication becomes a meaningless waste of time. Cheers!

Let me clarify then: I do not discuss the DETAILS of conspiracy theories. I will not enter point by point discussions about building 7, HAARP, chemtrails and all the rest. You may also be confused about my statement because I DO talk about the rich conspiring against the poor. I also say that...

Conspiracy theorist is certainly a derogatory term, just as "Truth Movement" is an euphemism. Not everyone who is interested in conspiracies is a conspiracy theorist. Many conspiracies are well documented. Declassified and leaked documents can all reveal genuine conspiracies going on. That the...

Well, the forum was already fucked after years of neglect. At least zezt is keeping the English section active. But to make something clear: I'm neither a supporter of the Venus Project nor of Descartes. And I do not discuss conspiracy theories (9/11, chemtrails etc.), as they are a waste of time.

And to clear up the testosteron issue, let me quote some more from that page. Neurochemical differences Hormones Steroid hormones have several effects on brain development as well as maintenance of homeostasis throughout adulthood. One effect they exhibit is on the hypothalamus, where they...

It's not a matter of "having testosterone", but the quantity of it. From Wikipedia: On the basis of diffusion tensor imaging of 1,000 brain scans it has been shown that significant differences in wiring exist between male and female brains. Men's brains were shown to have stronger...

"It is pseudoscience" No, this is reputable science. In fact this is a field of science in which there's no room for disagreement. By the end of the second month, male fetuses start producing testosterone, which modulates their brain development. This differentiation is necessary for the...

"He discounts 'spirit', and thus puts himself in with the patriarchal toxic myth-makers lineage." I don't see the logic in this statement. The patriarchal religions all believed in spirit. And the further you move into secular circules, the more men and women have equal rights and equal...

It is now clear who did it: BrainEater. And what I've understood from another member is that he was already in the habit of deleting threads that he had started himself. But recently he took it to a new level, deleting dozens of threads started by others. Though I've never had any disagreement...

[video=youtube;YywkyzL0QO4]

I think that video is mostly bullshit. First of all, there's no evidence whatsoever that the current elite of super rich families has anything to do with the Illuminati. Historically, the Illuminati were a group of intellectuals supporting Enlightenment ideals, who were opposed to the monarchies...

I'm aware that Jacques Fresco has a rather materialistic world view. So although I like his designs and many of his ideas about culture, I do not necessarily subscribe to all his views. I'm also aware of the various conspiracy theories involving Jacques Fresco, created by right wing...

"So-called 'education' is the first full on mind control we all face from being very young. Some of these rich evil sadists got sent to boarding school when they were kids. So they are extremely indoctrinated, because they cannot even escape that place and go home." Absolutely. Reminds me...

This is a logical fallacy called Argumentum ad hominem. It indicates you don't have valid counterarguments, and so revert to character assassination in a desparate attempt to devalue what the other has said. This is typical of people driven by a certain ideology, rather than committed to reason...

Many more names here: Erowid Women & Psychoactives Vault And very relevant to this topic: Women and Psychoactives: A Brief Overview

It has nothing to do with laziness. When you quote some text that is more than a few sentences, and don't point out HOW it contradicts what I wrote, I will not read it. I watched this lecture today, by developmental biologist Lewis Wolpert. He's presenting his case very well. No bullshit...

No. If you want to make a point, do so in your own words, and make sure it's relevant to the things I wrote. You can't expect others to read lengthy articles. And whether someone calls those differences "bullshit" is irrelevant. Creationists call evolution bullshit and in an argument will urge...