This morning, I just heard former PM of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto was killed in a suicide bombing in Pakistan....
As many of you know, Pakistan has been fence-sitting for a long time in the 'war on terrorism'....with many suspecting, and some outtright saying that Osama Bin LAden hides in the mountains along the Afghani border, with the implicit
consent of Musharif and the Pakistani government.
I suspect that our CIA probably played a role in this to some extent....this fits their historically documented modus operandi ( way of operating) concerning manipulations and machinations of/toward any foriegn government we are able to influence (= buy our way in) for our own selfish goals.
Did anyone read what I wrote concerning the Bushs' relationship with the House of Saud?
Bandar Bush?
Well, why in the world, one may ask, would anyone do such a thing?
The neo-cons want Pakistan to choose a side, plain and simple.... and this is how you do it, by reducing their choices from THREE to TWO.
Killing Bhutto should have the immediate, short-term effect of destabilizing the region further, something the neo-cons AND the islamic eztremists want.... it should have the more mid-range effect of polarizing the people, and THAT is how you make things happen in this arena.
We all know Musharif is the modern version of a defanged
(somewhat, anyway) Saddam.... He's 'OUR BOY'....
and he is MUCH closer in ideology to Bush than BVhutto was. Bhutto was like a paki version of an American democrat; moderate, somewhat morally corrupt, but interested in progress and the advancement of the people...the exact opposite of a neo-con agenda. Hello?
The CIA traditionally effects this meddling that they enjoy so much by exploiting rival factions within a government, then secretly funding the faction they think they can control the easiest.....this strategy has WITHOUT FAIL blown up in their stupid faces everyt5ime they employ it, but they don't care about that, the short term results are what they are after, and they figure they'll just coerce, bribe and kill their way strait if it gets too complicated.
Everyone here in America trusts the government FAR too much and....WHERE'S the oversight?
Oh, there is none, that's rifgt...we allowed King W to pass the patriot act and enact 'Der Fatherland, er 'Homeland Security' legislation.
It was the CIA, working indirectly, I promise you.
Why?
To polarize the people into an American version of 'jihad'
and to force Pakistan to join up, or to be an enemy....
the track record is too chock-full of these CIA shenanigans to not believe it.
The CIA should be dismantled entirely.
Totally.
Period.
As many of you know, Pakistan has been fence-sitting for a long time in the 'war on terrorism'....with many suspecting, and some outtright saying that Osama Bin LAden hides in the mountains along the Afghani border, with the implicit
consent of Musharif and the Pakistani government.
I suspect that our CIA probably played a role in this to some extent....this fits their historically documented modus operandi ( way of operating) concerning manipulations and machinations of/toward any foriegn government we are able to influence (= buy our way in) for our own selfish goals.
Did anyone read what I wrote concerning the Bushs' relationship with the House of Saud?
Bandar Bush?
Well, why in the world, one may ask, would anyone do such a thing?
The neo-cons want Pakistan to choose a side, plain and simple.... and this is how you do it, by reducing their choices from THREE to TWO.
Killing Bhutto should have the immediate, short-term effect of destabilizing the region further, something the neo-cons AND the islamic eztremists want.... it should have the more mid-range effect of polarizing the people, and THAT is how you make things happen in this arena.
We all know Musharif is the modern version of a defanged
(somewhat, anyway) Saddam.... He's 'OUR BOY'....
and he is MUCH closer in ideology to Bush than BVhutto was. Bhutto was like a paki version of an American democrat; moderate, somewhat morally corrupt, but interested in progress and the advancement of the people...the exact opposite of a neo-con agenda. Hello?
The CIA traditionally effects this meddling that they enjoy so much by exploiting rival factions within a government, then secretly funding the faction they think they can control the easiest.....this strategy has WITHOUT FAIL blown up in their stupid faces everyt5ime they employ it, but they don't care about that, the short term results are what they are after, and they figure they'll just coerce, bribe and kill their way strait if it gets too complicated.
Everyone here in America trusts the government FAR too much and....WHERE'S the oversight?
Oh, there is none, that's rifgt...we allowed King W to pass the patriot act and enact 'Der Fatherland, er 'Homeland Security' legislation.
It was the CIA, working indirectly, I promise you.
Why?
To polarize the people into an American version of 'jihad'
and to force Pakistan to join up, or to be an enemy....
the track record is too chock-full of these CIA shenanigans to not believe it.
The CIA should be dismantled entirely.
Totally.
Period.