Quoi de neuf ?

Bienvenue sur Psychonaut.fr !

En vous enregistrant, vous pourrez discuter de psychotropes, écrire vos meilleurs trip-reports et mieux connaitre la communauté

Je m'inscris!

weed babies do better (suppressed research)

spice

Holofractale de l'hypervérité
Inscrit
22 Déc 2006
Messages
3 774
More stuff they are afraid we'll realize





A 30-day test showed that children of ganja-using mothers were superior to children of non-ganja mothers in two ways: the children had better organization and modulation of sleeping and waking, and they were less prone to stress-related anxiety.

The editors of Patients for Medical Cannabis were in attendance at the final hearing of the Iowa Pharmacy Board’s review of medical marijuana, where Dr. Melanie Dreher presented the results of her studies with “ganja babies” over the phone. (You can read her testimony on the second page here.) She has been studying the medical uses of ganja, as it’s called in Jamaica, for 30 years.

A quotation from Dreher’s testimony - “You know, people ask me all the time whether I think marijuana should be legalized, and I have been of the opinion for a long time that this is much ado about nothing. It is, compared to tobacco and alcohol, this is such a benign substance.

“It does not seem to make a difference in either the productivity of the people in Jamaica… it seems to make no difference in terms of exposure during pregnancy …We looked at these children again at age five, both groups of children, and could find absolutely nothing that linked their development with their exposure during pregnancy.

“I …would strongly support the decriminalization of cannabis, and now that we understand about the endocannabinoid system that this is documented, it’s researched… now that we have knowledge of why cannabis is good medicine, something that Jamaicans have known for years, I think it’s time to seriously revisit this product, to understand and be able to dispense is as medicine legally and to decriminalize the other uses of marijuana.”

The presenter following her turned to the Pharmacy Board members and said, “Did you hear that? What she is saying is that marijuana is so safe, it doesn’t even hurt a fetus!”

No signs of birth defects

A landmark study conducted in the 1990s by medical anthropologist Dr. Dreher, (co-author of the book Women and Cannabis: Medicine, Science, and Sociology), gave the medical world a different insight into the use of marijuana by pregnant women in Jamaica. Dreher found that marijuana was being used in a cultural and medical context, as a way to relieve morning sickness or nausea, prevent depression and fatigue, and improve appetites. Her team observed both the mothers who used marijuana and their infants; they reported that there were no signs of birth defects or of behavioral problems in the marijuana-exposed children either during the month after birth or even several years after.

This is not to say that women should have no compunctions about using marijuana regularly and in large amounts during pregnancy. Rather, as scientists like Dreher argue, the medical community should improve its research methodologies, be more thorough, conduct more cross-cultural studies, and refrain from being so quick to conclude without solid evidence that any amount of marijuana use–no matter how slight–during pregnancy will do lasting harm to both mother and child.





Melanie Dreher, RN, PhD, FAAN explains her cannabis and pregnancy research study in Jamaica. Pregnant women and their children were studied for over ten plus years, both marijuana smokers and non-smokers were included in the study – one of the first scientific studies of the effects that cannabis may have on pregnancy and the child’s development thereafter.


Prenatal Marijuana Exposure and Neonatal Outcomes in Jamaica:

An Ethnographic Study

“Although no positive or negative neurobehavioral effects of prenatal exposure were found at 3 days of life using the Brazelton examination, there were significant differences between the exposed and non-exposed neonates at the end of the first month.

Comparing the two groups, the neonates of mothers who used marijuana showed better physiological stability at 1 month and required less examiner facilitation to reach an organized state and become available for social stimulation.

The results of the comparison of neonates of the heavy-marijuana-using mothers and those of the non-using mothers were even more striking…

The heavily exposed neonates were more socially responsive and were more autonomically stable at 30 days than their matched counterparts.
quality of their alertness was higher;
their motor and autonomic systems were more robust;
they were less irritable;
they were less likely to demonstrate any imbalance of tone;
they needed less examiner facilitation to become organized;
they had better self-regulation;
judged to be more rewarding for caregivers than the neonates of non-using mothers at 1 month of age
~



Dr. Dreher observes cultural contexts of marijuana use in peri-natal and neo-natal studies, including use of “Ganja Tea”. Appearing before the 2004 Cannabis Therapeutics Conference, hosted by Patients Out of Time.

The following comes from an excellent article about Dr. Dreher from Cannabis Culture:

When Dreher released solidly researched reports showing that children of ganja-using mothers were better adjusted than children born to non-using mothers, she encountered political and professional turbulence.

Dr. Melanie Dreher is one of a handful of scientists who have researched marijuana objectively and intelligently in the last three decades.

Dr Dreher is Dean of the University of Iowa’s College of Nursing, and also holds the post of Associate Director for the University’s Department of Nursing and Patient Services. She’s a perpetual overachiever who earned honors degrees in nursing, anthropology and philosophy before being awarded a PhD in anthropology from prestigious Columbia University in 1977.

Although Dreher is a multi-faceted researcher and teacher whose expertise ranges from culture to child development to public health, she began early on to specialize in medical anthropology. After distinguishing herself as a field researcher in graduate school, Dreher was hand-picked by her professors to conduct a major study of marijuana use in Jamaica. Her doctoral dissertation was published as a book titled “Working Men and Ganja,” which stands as one of the premier cross-cultural studies of chronic marijuana use.

Along with being a widely-published researcher, writer, and college administrator, Dreher is a professor or lecturer at several institutions, including the University of the West Indies. She recently served as president of the 120,000 member Sigma Theta Tau International Nursing Honour Society, has been an expert witness in a religious freedom case involving ganja use by the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church, and is one of the most well-respected academicians in the world.

This article explains why you hadn’t heard this news before:

Dreher’s Jamaican Pregnancy Study -

More Suppression of Marijuana Research

an excerpt:

Dreher decried “the politics of trying to get published.” She now sees it as “a miracle” that Pediatrics published her work on neonatal outcomes, however belatedly, in 1994. (Her paper on five-year outcomes came out in the West Indian Medical Journal before Pediatrics ran the neonatal outcomes.) She suspects that a review of “all the fugitive literature that’s out there that didn’t get published” would convey “a very different picture of prenatal cannabis exposure.”

Honest research is also impeded, Dreher said, by “the politics of building a research career. Most research is done by academics and academia is a very conservative environment where tenure often is more important than truth.” (Dreher is now Dean of the College of Nursing at the University of Iowa.)

The end result of biased science, Dreher observed, is a misinformed public. Recently, she “googled to see what was out there for the general public regarding pregnancy and marijuana.” Typical of the disinformation was an article entitled “Exposure to marijuana in womb may harm brain’ that began “Over the past decade several studies have linked behavior problems and lower IQ scores in children to prenatal use of marijuana…” A reference to Dreher said she had “written extensively on the benefits of smoking marijuana while smoking pregnant!”



when will people become angry?



Is righteous anger even a capacity that we posess anymore?
 

ophiuchus

Holofractale de l'hypervérité
Inscrit
14 Nov 2006
Messages
4 530
it will become legal soon enough. there are signs that i've seen that reassure me of this. the john hopkins lsd-cluster headaches research is just one example off the top of my head. eventually the snowball will be too large to stop
 

Cultosaurus

Elfe Mécanique
Inscrit
11 Sept 2011
Messages
268
Allusion a dit:
it will become legal soon enough. there are signs that i've seen that reassure me of this. the john hopkins lsd-cluster headaches research is just one example off the top of my head. eventually the snowball will be too large to stop

I wish that I had your optimism.

I have seen the BS government in this country make a 180 degree U turn and is now pressing for harsher sentencing. And it seems that no matter what happens at the state level in the US, that the DEA seems to think that it can override the presidential order not to attack and raid dispensaries, but they ignore state law and do so regardless . The Netherlands have reversed the legal status of mushrooms.

You are correct, however, that there are more and more positive reports coming from reputable sources proving the efficacy of various entheogens and cannabis. The problem is not those reports, it's the politicians that are supposed to take positive action on such reports and are to return our stolen civil and human rights to us. It just seems that no matter how many people show up to a Hempfest, a Marijuana day or some other showing of people that are for the positive uses of pot and other agents, that nothing seems to come of it. The power of the people is not showing changes in legislation.

There are, of course, all kinds of reasons, but none of them stand up to the fact that change is not occurring. I really need to see things change. I'm getting too old to wait for them to become a common medications and to be given back my rights as an individual who is capable of making my own decisions for myself.

Peace
Cult
 

ophiuchus

Holofractale de l'hypervérité
Inscrit
14 Nov 2006
Messages
4 530
i agree it can be frustrating, and you're right, we really aren't seeing any changes right now. worst case, it may be a matter of 'passing the torch' and simply waiting for that generation of legislators to simply, well, die... not much of a better way to put it, but i think that once the younger generation comes to power, things cannot help but be different. there is so much knowledge out here (internet) about it. too much to ignore. it may not be much consolation, but, im willing to bet it'll happen :) even become common practice (not necessarily smoking)
 

spice

Holofractale de l'hypervérité
Inscrit
22 Déc 2006
Messages
3 774
I disagree. They are too good at preparing new brainwashees for taking the reigns of power

when they die, there will be some new, younger version of them in the place


the answer is the renunciation of a sick, sick culture


sorry but there it is
 

MasterOwel

Matrice périnatale
Inscrit
24 Sept 2014
Messages
8
Do you have any links to these articles? The original sources would be very helpful.
 
Haut