GOD a dit:
MAOIs are MAOIs and all have the effects of MAOIs . The only difference is the length of action and the strength of the action .
no. There are differences in maois such as, if they are reversible or not, act on mao-a or mao-b, which makes tons of difference for example for how it will work out with food interaction
GOD a dit:
Why should anyone abuse pharmacuticals when they can use natural MAOIs ?
you are already supposing that whoever uses these pharmaceuticals are ´abusing´. Dont suppose too much, it´s bad for your health.
I know people who use it very respectfully (though I have already argued with them against pharmaceutical industry, but still what they do is definitely not ´abuse´)
GOD a dit:
When i walk down the street and see something brown , smelly and steaming i dont have to go and put my finger in it and taste it to see if its chocolate .
I didnt catch what´s this analogy supposed to relate to
GOD a dit:
My body is a temple not a dump for chemical waste .
´natural´ substances also contain chemicals. Being natural or not doesnt mean its good or not for your body. Take a bit of curare, get bitten by a poisonous snake or so on and you´ll see.. Plants are also chemical factories. Remember nature does not have human morals, this is all imposed/externalized/projected.
That being said, I also tend towards (some) natural substances instead of chemical, but not because of an illusionary romantic view that ´nature is good, man-produced is bad´.. It´s rather because, firstly, I dont want to give money to the pharmaceutical industry. Secondly, because I dont want to ingest substances that are not proven to be safe (for example thousands of years of human use without problems). Not to mention I dont want to take substances that for their existance, thousands of animal testing was necessary.
btw, if you are so confident on ´your body being a temple´, I guess you eat perfectly, no industrial products at all, and also dont watch tv, right? or else what you are saying is hypocrisy.