I think your looking for deductive reasoning.
But that is still not what you are doing, you try to disprove math rules by grabbing them at the very basis and then changing it there. Ofcourse the rules then make no sense anymore.
and i think you said 1+1=i here:
Dantediv86 a dit:
the equation could be written 1+1= {1+1+[1+1+(1+1+i)]} now i wrote "i" otherwise it takes lots of parenthesis and invinite pages
I think the only room for philosophy in maths is with infinity. I have spent a long time thinking about it and it is full of paradoxes, but that is not what we are talking about now.
none the less i think you have very bright insights, but maybe you should express them in another way then maths.
BTW,the opposite also exists; there has been a research about the force that a number of people can produce.
The results were that with the more people you push something, the less effective it gets. Like when you push a car, you perform at max. When you are with 2, you push less hard. This is also something you need to bring into the equation when dealing with large numbers of people. The 'force' or 'possibilities' they can produce decreases dramatically in large numbers. But ofcourse they do have the potential you spoke about, but it is impossible to use it to the fullest. But also this is another subject.