phalaris
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 7/5/05
- Messages
- 1 112
The mycelium is really close to the roots of most plant, even providing the plant with nutrients that were broken down by the mycelium. If that is taking place, diffusion of hormones through the mycelium should also be possible. Once a molecule has enterered the mycelium (or another root) it is actively transported along the cell membranes. there is a flow inside most cells, there are even movies of this process.(sorry no link,maybe later) the molecules that cause this are actines/myosines. yes, the same stuff used in muscles.
That this inter-plant chemical exchange is not known does not mean it does not exist, it only means that nobody has properly looked for it yet. The effect are most probably subtle, to sensitive measurements should be taken.
Say, for fun, reaction A->B begins suddenly after a threashold of A and trigger T, rapidly depleating A.
B is partly converted into T by a mycelium. Then connected neigbours can be triggered into releasing B themselves provided they were inactive long enough. This is just an example of oscilating reactions localized to groups of plants.
To test this, a whole battery of mass spectrometers could monitor the chemical composition of the plants in response to, for example, shading patterns.
communication is interaction with something or someone to interpret the information. so in that sense, probably no communication is taking place between plants nodes. BUT I am convinced that plants are reacting to each others chemistry, because they are not chemically isolated from each other. In an organism (plant or animal) there are dozens of complex interacting chemical feedback loops, and some have threasholds. So I don't think it is farfetched that plants influence each others' plant chemistry.
as for a field of grass having consiousness; that ofcource is wild speculation, but the underlying network supports it in principle.
That this inter-plant chemical exchange is not known does not mean it does not exist, it only means that nobody has properly looked for it yet. The effect are most probably subtle, to sensitive measurements should be taken.
Say, for fun, reaction A->B begins suddenly after a threashold of A and trigger T, rapidly depleating A.
B is partly converted into T by a mycelium. Then connected neigbours can be triggered into releasing B themselves provided they were inactive long enough. This is just an example of oscilating reactions localized to groups of plants.
To test this, a whole battery of mass spectrometers could monitor the chemical composition of the plants in response to, for example, shading patterns.
There is no communication here between the plants.
communication is interaction with something or someone to interpret the information. so in that sense, probably no communication is taking place between plants nodes. BUT I am convinced that plants are reacting to each others chemistry, because they are not chemically isolated from each other. In an organism (plant or animal) there are dozens of complex interacting chemical feedback loops, and some have threasholds. So I don't think it is farfetched that plants influence each others' plant chemistry.
as for a field of grass having consiousness; that ofcource is wild speculation, but the underlying network supports it in principle.