I only know of GOD and Brainie understanding German.
http://www.punkt.ch/inland/story.html?n ... wsid=51690
For the others: The source (a daily, free swiss paper) yesterday (9.11) posted a column about Swiss researchers that want a new 9/11 investigation (ref. Matrix in Action). They say that the official explanation is not sufficient enough.
They raise the question:
Why the army wasn't able to shoot down the captured planes.
How a person that didn't even solve the test for a Cessna was able to fly into a Pentagon with a maneuvre that also professionals judge as difficult.
Why the building crushed. They also have the thesis that there is a high probability that there were explosives in the Tower.
Why there was insider trade e.g. on American Airlines stocks that later made a LOT of money.
They get in distance from conspiracies and only raise the question about a new investigation.
Don't attack me, I am just the messenger
Quite interesting that they are doing this officially now. But I doubt if someone will listen to swiss (!) researchers (!). Switzerland has absolutely no influence and researchers are only laughed about. But nice approach.
http://www.punkt.ch/inland/story.html?n ... wsid=51690
For the others: The source (a daily, free swiss paper) yesterday (9.11) posted a column about Swiss researchers that want a new 9/11 investigation (ref. Matrix in Action). They say that the official explanation is not sufficient enough.
They raise the question:
Why the army wasn't able to shoot down the captured planes.
How a person that didn't even solve the test for a Cessna was able to fly into a Pentagon with a maneuvre that also professionals judge as difficult.
Why the building crushed. They also have the thesis that there is a high probability that there were explosives in the Tower.
Why there was insider trade e.g. on American Airlines stocks that later made a LOT of money.
They get in distance from conspiracies and only raise the question about a new investigation.
Don't attack me, I am just the messenger
